They love it when they come here and it brings out the youth in them. Hanford Court wellbeing worker Lisa Wilkinson, aged 46, of Meir, said: “We asked the residents who would like to meet the children and had a number come forward. Debt-ridden Stoke-on-Trent College in bid for £21.9m bailout - but what could it mean for the 8,000 students?Įvery Thursday, 10 children, aged between four and five, head over to the home where they are greeted by a group of residents, who are all aged 80 and above.īut tomorrow (February 15) the pensioners will be visiting the Jubilee Road school.“One week they did drawings and one of the pupils took it to a resident’s room and when we were going he told me getting that picture had made his day.” Read More Related Articles They have found a real mutual respect and class each other as friends. “It’s really good as the children aren’t always used to working with people from an older generation. When I got in touch with Hanford Court they were more than happy to be a part of it. The 38-year-old, of Trentham, said: “I watched a few episodes and then went to the headteacher with the idea. They should ensure the release process involves more transparency, increased accountability - and more extensive public input from victims and prosecutors.Pictured with resident Doris Newbon are five-year-old Kelsey-Mae Hiorns, left, George Cooke, aged four 20 to develop permanent regulations for the law. The crafters of Proposition 57 promised that public safety would not be compromised. 57 we didn’t like in November and don’t like now is that it allows certain violent offenders to be eligible for early release once they have completed their sentence for the violent felony but are still serving time for nonviolent felonies. Law enforcement officials know only too well what it means to have more habitual offenders back on the streets. It’s troubling, though, that California’s violent crime rate rose by more than 4 percent in 2016, which made the state rate an outlier with the rest of the country. More definitive results may tell how the law is trending. Supporters say the new law is not a “get out of jail free card,” but simply gives inmates an opportunity to ask for an early parole hearing and another chance at rehabilitation. 57, however, was the third measure supported by voters easing California’s tough-on-crime laws, after federal courts ordered the state to reduce prison overcrowding. Nor will prosecutors have access to inmates’ prison behavior records, which she called “critical to rehabilitation.” For prosecutors, this limits our ability to adequately investigate the details of the offense,” Schubert wrote. “For victims, this severely undercuts their right to be heard and to give confidential input on the inmate’s release. Police are cut out of the review process entirely. What Schubert found equally troubling was that early release decisions will be made without any public hearing and that prosecutors and victims get only 30 days to provide written objections. Writing earlier this summer in the Sacramento Bee, Schubert noted that among the 135 offenders in her county eligible for early release were gang members convicted of violent crimes and inmates with past convictions for violent offenses and others with lengthy criminal histories. More than 8,500 did just that and state prison officials are now sorting through emails and letters from crime victims, inmates, prosecutors and reform advocates. Over the summer, the public was invited to comment on just who ought to be freed. 57 as written was unclear about how it would affect convicts incarcerated for the same offense, but with differing criminal histories that would indicate a propensity and track record of re-offending. They also said the language of the measure left it unclear whether some sex crimes were included - and that a number of other violent crimes were on the list whose perpetrators would qualify for early release. 57’s definition of violent crimes was too narrow and that some crimes were not specified. Their reasons were convincing: that Prop. We also noted that the vast majority of district attorneys and top law enforcement officials in the state opposed Prop. 8, Californians, including a sizeable majority of county voters, approved Proposition 57, which allows thousands of prison inmates to apply for early release.īefore the election, this newspaper editorialized against the measure, saying that while the intention of reducing prison overcrowding was worthwhile, we had grave doubts about the law’s implementation and the vagueness in just who would be eligible for release.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |